<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/wp-content/themes/feed/atom.xsl"?>
<feed
        xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
        xmlns:wwe="http://release.wwe.com/atom/1.0"
        xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0"
        xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
        xml:lang="en-US"
        xml:base="https://www.oh-criminal-lawyer.com/wp-atom.php"
	>
    <title type="text">Law Office of Gregory S. Robey </title>
    <subtitle type="text">Law Offices of Gregory S. Robey</subtitle>

    <updated>2026-09-08T17:54:17Z</updated>

    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.oh-criminal-lawyer.com" />
    <id>https://www.oh-criminal-lawyer.com/feed/atom/</id>
    <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.oh-criminal-lawyer.com/feed/atom/?forceByPassCache=0.41914126558718345" />
	
	<generator uri="https://wordpress.org/" version="6.9.7">WordPress</generator>
<icon>/wp-content/uploads/sites/1304139/2025/05/cropped-Gregory_s_robey_site_icon-32x32.png</icon>
        <entry>
            <author>
									                    <name>On Behalf of Law Office of Gregory S. Robey</name>
				            </author>
            <title type="html"><![CDATA[What happens after you receive a federal target letter?]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.oh-criminal-lawyer.com/blog/2026/09/what-happens-after-you-receive-a-federal-target-letter/" />
            <id>https://www.oh-criminal-lawyer.com/?p=47814</id>
            <updated>2026-09-04T17:55:00Z</updated>
            <published>2026-09-08T17:54:17Z</published>
					<taxo:topics><![CDATA[-]]></taxo:topics>
            <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Receiving a target letter is not the same as facing formal charges. However, it shows that federal prosecutors consider you a putative defendant, meaning someone they may seek to charge, and believe substantial evidence connects you to the crime under investigation. What does being a federal target mean? The Department of Justice separates a target from a subject or witness.…]]></summary>
			                <content type="html" xml:base="https://www.oh-criminal-lawyer.com/blog/2026/09/what-happens-after-you-receive-a-federal-target-letter/"><![CDATA[Receiving a target letter is not the same as facing formal charges. However, it shows that federal prosecutors consider you a putative defendant, meaning someone they may seek to charge, and believe substantial evidence connects you to the crime under investigation.
<h2>What does being a federal target mean?</h2>
The Department of Justice separates a target from a subject or witness. Under <a href="https://www.justice.gov/jm/jm-9-11000-grand-jury" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" data-wpel-link="external">DOJ guidelines</a>, a person becomes a target when prosecutors or the grand jury have substantial evidence connecting that person to a crime and prosecutors regard the person as a putative defendant.

The letter may describe the actions under investigation or list <a href="https://www.oh-criminal-lawyer.com/criminal-law/" target="_blank" rel="noopener" data-wpel-link="internal">possible federal crimes</a>. Target status is serious because prosecutors may be deciding whether to seek an indictment from a grand jury.
<h2>What should you do after receiving a target letter?</h2>
Because statements and records can affect a federal case, several immediate steps can help you avoid added problems:
<ul>
 	<li>Avoid discussing the case with federal agents before getting legal guidance.</li>
 	<li>Preserve emails, texts, financial records and other documents tied to the matter.</li>
 	<li>Review the letter for possible charges, deadlines or requests.</li>
 	<li>Contact a federal criminal defense attorney early to understand the letter and the possible charges under review.</li>
</ul>
Each step can affect how you respond as the investigation moves forward.
<h2>Why statements and documents matter</h2>
Anything you say to investigators may later be used against you. Federal law can also make it a crime to knowingly and willfully give a false statement that matters to a federal investigation.

Destroying, changing or hiding records with the intent to interfere with a federal investigation may also violate federal law. Keeping records intact can help avoid questions about whether evidence was changed or discarded.

The investigation may continue while prosecutors decide what action, if any, to take.
<h2>What could happen next?</h2>
A target letter does not guarantee that prosecutors will file charges. They may gather more evidence, ask for testimony or decide whether to seek an indictment.

If prosecutors ask you to testify before the grand jury, you have a Fifth Amendment right not to give answers that could incriminate you. However, the government may require you to testify if it obtains a court order granting immunity.
<h2>Legal review can clarify what the government is investigating</h2>
A target letter may give only part of the government's view of the case. Legal counsel can review the letter, identify what it does not explain and speak with prosecutors when appropriate. This can clarify the possible charges, the government's concerns and what may happen next.]]></content>
						        </entry>
	        <entry>
            <author>
									                    <name>On Behalf of Law Office of Gregory S. Robey</name>
				            </author>
            <title type="html"><![CDATA[Can domestic violence charges be dropped if a victim recants?]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.oh-criminal-lawyer.com/blog/2026/09/can-domestic-violence-charges-be-dropped-if-a-victim-recants/" />
            <id>https://www.oh-criminal-lawyer.com/?p=47815</id>
            <updated>2026-09-04T17:44:06Z</updated>
            <published>2026-09-04T17:44:06Z</published>
					<taxo:topics><![CDATA[-]]></taxo:topics>
            <summary type="html"><![CDATA[If someone reports domestic violence and later changes their story, you may expect the criminal case to disappear. You may also feel relieved if the person who made the report no longer wants to participate. But a change in their account does not settle what happens next. Ohio law gives prosecutors room to consider the entire situation rather than simply…]]></summary>
			                <content type="html" xml:base="https://www.oh-criminal-lawyer.com/blog/2026/09/can-domestic-violence-charges-be-dropped-if-a-victim-recants/"><![CDATA[<span style="font-weight: 400;">If someone reports domestic violence and later changes their story, you may expect the criminal case to disappear. You may also feel relieved if the person who made the report no longer wants to participate. But a change in their account does not settle what happens next. Ohio law gives prosecutors room to consider the entire situation rather than simply following the alleged victim’s wishes. </span>

<span style="font-weight: 400;">Here is what that can mean for your case.</span>
<h2><span style="font-weight: 400;">A changed story does not automatically dismiss the charges</span></h2>
<span style="font-weight: 400;">A recantation or request to drop the case does not automatically end the charges against you. The prosecutor handles the criminal case for the state, so the alleged victim </span><a href="https://codes.ohio.gov/ohio-revised-code/section-2935.03" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" data-wpel-link="external"><span style="font-weight: 400;">cannot simply withdraw the charges personally</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;">. Ohio law says prosecutors must consider relevant facts and circumstances when deciding whether to continue or dismiss a domestic violence prosecution, even when the alleged victim stops cooperating or asks to drop the charges.</span>
<h2><span style="font-weight: 400;">Prosecutors may rely on evidence beyond the victim's statement</span></h2>
<span style="font-weight: 400;">Even after the alleged victim changes their account, other evidence may support the allegations. Depending on the circumstances, that evidence could include:</span>
<ul>
 	<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">911 calls</span></li>
 	<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Police observations</span></li>
 	<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Photographs of injuries or property damage</span></li>
 	<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Text messages or other communications</span></li>
 	<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Medical records</span></li>
 	<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Witness statements</span></li>
</ul>
<span style="font-weight: 400;">For example, if officers documented injuries when they arrived or witnesses described what they saw, those details may remain available after the alleged victim changes their account. The prosecutor can evaluate those materials along with the original report and later statements.</span>
<h2><span style="font-weight: 400;">A recantation can create issues with the prosecution's evidence</span></h2>
<span style="font-weight: 400;">Conflicting accounts can affect how the prosecution evaluates its case, but they do not guarantee dismissal. A complete recantation differs from correcting a minor detail or giving a different account of part of the incident. If your case contains conflicting statements, your attorney can examine the original report and later account to determine how those differences may affect the evidence.</span>
<h2><span style="font-weight: 400;">A changed story does not eliminate the need for a defense</span></h2>
<span style="font-weight: 400;">You should still take the charges seriously even if the alleged victim no longer wants to participate. Speaking with a criminal defense attorney before making statements can help you </span><a href="https://www.oh-criminal-lawyer.com/criminal-law/domestic-violence/" target="_blank" rel="noopener" data-wpel-link="internal"><span style="font-weight: 400;">avoid responses that could complicate your case</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;">. If you need to speak directly with the alleged victim, ask your attorney first about the appropriate way to handle that conversation so it does not appear that you are pressuring or coaching them.</span>
<h2><span style="font-weight: 400;">Know what a changed story means for your case</span></h2>
<span style="font-weight: 400;">A recantation may affect the strength of a domestic violence case, but it does not guarantee dismissal. Reviewing the original report, later statements and other evidence with your attorney can help you understand your legal options and determine how to respond.</span>]]></content>
						        </entry>
	        <entry>
            <author>
									                    <name>On Behalf of Law Office of Gregory S. Robey</name>
				            </author>
            <title type="html"><![CDATA[What is a RICO charge?]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.oh-criminal-lawyer.com/blog/2026/06/what-is-a-rico-charge/" />
            <id>https://www.oh-criminal-lawyer.com/?p=47811</id>
            <updated>2026-06-11T15:31:13Z</updated>
            <published>2026-06-11T15:29:44Z</published>
					<taxo:topics><![CDATA[-]]></taxo:topics>
            <summary type="html"><![CDATA[The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act is a federal law enacted to combat organized criminal activity. While it originally targeted traditional organized crime, prosecutors now use it for many different cases including when they believe individuals participated in a pattern of criminal activity connected to an organization, business or group, even if that group appears legitimate on the…]]></summary>
			                <content type="html" xml:base="https://www.oh-criminal-lawyer.com/blog/2026/06/what-is-a-rico-charge/"><![CDATA[The<span style="font-weight: 400;"> Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act is a federal law enacted to combat organized criminal activity. While it originally targeted traditional organized crime, prosecutors now use it for many different cases including when they believe individuals participated in a pattern of criminal activity connected to an organization, business or group, even if that group appears legitimate on the surface.</span>

<span style="font-weight: 400;">At its core, a RICO case is about proving an “enterprise” and showing that the defendants conducted or participated in the enterprise’s affairs through a pattern of racketeering activity. That pattern generally requires multiple related criminal acts over time, not a single isolated incident.</span>
<h2><span style="font-weight: 400;">How prosecutors build a RICO case</span></h2>
<span style="font-weight: 400;">RICO allows prosecutors to connect people and conduct that they may otherwise charge as separate crimes. Instead of treating each alleged offense as a standalone event, the government may argue that the acts were coordinated, repeated and tied to a shared structure or purpose.</span>

<span style="font-weight: 400;">Before listing the kinds of crimes that can support a RICO charge, it helps to understand the concept of “predicate acts.” These are specific offenses that, when committed as part of a pattern, can form the foundation of a RICO prosecution. Common examples include:</span>
<ul>
 	<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Fraud offenses, including mail fraud and wire fraud  </span></li>
 	<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Money laundering and financial structuring  </span></li>
 	<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;"><a href="https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/twenty-six-trinitarios-gang-members-charged-rico-conspiracy-related-five-murders-after" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" data-wpel-link="external">Drug trafficking</a> and distribution conspiracies  </span></li>
 	<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Bribery and public corruption schemes  </span></li>
 	<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Extortion and threats tied to business or personal gain  </span></li>
 	<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Cyber crimes, including certain hacking and online fraud conduct</span></li>
</ul>
<span style="font-weight: 400;">The prosecution has adapted how it uses these charges, moving from a focus on pursuing organizations that operate under the old day mob mentality to combinations that reflect how modern </span><span style="font-weight: 400;">allegedly illegal enterprises</span><span style="font-weight: 400;"> operate, particularly where money, influence or data is involved.</span>
<h2><span style="font-weight: 400;">Why RICO charges are so serious</span></h2>
<span style="font-weight: 400;">RICO charges often involve lengthy investigations, extensive evidence and multiple defendants, which can increase both the legal exposure and the practical pressure on everyone involved. These cases involve review of extensive records, surveillance and cooperating witnesses as well as often including multiple counts that can increase sentencing exposure. Substantial penalties are possible if the charges result in a conviction, including forfeiture of assets tied to the enterprise and the possibility of significant prison sentences upon conviction.</span>

<span style="font-weight: 400;">A RICO charge is serious because it is not just about one alleged crime. It is about an alleged pattern of criminal activity connected to an enterprise, supported by predicate acts such as fraud, money laundering, drug trafficking, bribery, extortion and cyber crimes. When prosecutors pursue RICO, they are often signaling a long investigation, a large body of evidence and the potential for substantial penalties if a conviction follows. Those who face these charges have options. Legal counsel with experience in this niche area of law can review the allegations and help </span><a href="https://www.oh-criminal-lawyer.com/white-collar-crimes/rico/" target="_blank" rel="noopener" data-wpel-link="internal"><span style="font-weight: 400;">build a defense</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> to better ensure your rights are protected throughout the process. </span>]]></content>
						        </entry>
	        <entry>
            <author>
									                    <name>by Law Office of Gregory S. Robey</name>
				            </author>
            <title type="html"><![CDATA[Hawaii Doctor Convicted of Attempted Manslaughter of Wife]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.oh-criminal-lawyer.com/blog/2026/04/hawaii-doctor-convicted-of-attempted-manslaughter-of-wife/" />
            <id>https://www.oh-criminal-lawyer.com/?p=47809</id>
            <updated>2026-04-10T15:26:06Z</updated>
            <published>2026-04-10T15:26:06Z</published>
					<taxo:topics><![CDATA[-]]></taxo:topics>
            <summary type="html"><![CDATA[A Hawaii doctor was convicted of attempted manslaughter, in an attack on his wife as they were hiking on a secluded trail in Honolulu. Gerhardt Konig, an anesthesiologist from Maui, attacked his wife on her 36th birthday, as they hiked the Pali Puka trail near Honolulu. Two hikers heard Ms. Konig screaming for help and stopped the attack. Ms. Konig…]]></summary>
			                <content type="html" xml:base="https://www.oh-criminal-lawyer.com/blog/2026/04/hawaii-doctor-convicted-of-attempted-manslaughter-of-wife/"><![CDATA[A Hawaii doctor was convicted of attempted manslaughter, in an attack on his wife as they were hiking on a secluded trail in Honolulu. Gerhardt Konig, an anesthesiologist from Maui, attacked his wife on her 36th birthday, as they hiked the Pali Puka trail near Honolulu. Two hikers heard Ms. Konig screaming for help and stopped the attack. Ms. Konig testified that her husband tried to throw her over a steep cliff, and when that did not work, he then struck her in the face and head with a rock, causing her serious injuries. Dr. Konig testified that he was defending himself after his wife attacked him with a rock. The jury rejected the self defense claim and convicted him of attempted manslaughter, which under Hawaii law carries up to 20 years in prison. Prior to the incident, the couple had been experiencing marital problems, with Dr. Konig accusing his wife of having an affair with a co-worker. A sentencing hearing is set for August.]]></content>
						        </entry>
	        <entry>
            <author>
									                    <name>On Behalf of Law Office of Gregory S. Robey</name>
				            </author>
            <title type="html"><![CDATA[Money laundering and tax fraud: How professionals get caught in federal investigations]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.oh-criminal-lawyer.com/blog/2026/03/money-laundering-and-tax-fraud-how-professionals-get-caught-in-federal-investigations/" />
            <id>https://www.oh-criminal-lawyer.com/?p=47808</id>
            <updated>2026-03-14T02:51:14Z</updated>
            <published>2026-03-14T02:51:14Z</published>
					<taxo:topics><![CDATA[-]]></taxo:topics>
            <summary type="html"><![CDATA[For many professionals, a federal investigation starts not with a criminal intent, but with a series of poor financial decisions. High-achieving individuals often face immense pressure to maintain a certain lifestyle or cover up temporary business losses. Consequently, they may turn to complex financial maneuvers that cross the line into illegal activity. Understanding how the government identifies these schemes is…]]></summary>
			                <content type="html" xml:base="https://www.oh-criminal-lawyer.com/blog/2026/03/money-laundering-and-tax-fraud-how-professionals-get-caught-in-federal-investigations/"><![CDATA[For many professionals, a federal investigation starts not with a criminal intent, but with a series of poor financial decisions. High-achieving individuals often face immense pressure to maintain a certain lifestyle or cover up temporary business losses. Consequently, they may turn to complex financial maneuvers that cross the line into illegal activity. Understanding how the government identifies these schemes is the first step in recognizing the gravity of federal financial charges.
<h2>Common paths to federal scrutiny</h2>
Most people don’t set out to become international money launderers. Instead, they often find themselves entangled in a gray area that escalates. These individuals might use their specialized knowledge to hide the true source of funds or to lower their tax liability through illegal means.

Federal prosecutors frequently see the following scenarios in their case files:
<ul>
 	<li>Creating shell companies to move money between accounts without a clear business purpose</li>
 	<li>Falsifying business records to claim personal luxury expenses as professional deductions</li>
 	<li>Misreporting offshore income to avoid the heavy tax burdens of domestic filings</li>
 	<li>Structuring bank deposits in small amounts to avoid mandatory federal reporting limits</li>
</ul>
While these methods may work in the short term, they leave a digital trail that investigators are trained to follow. Once a professional starts down this path, it becomes increasingly difficult to undo the financial damage.
<h2>Red flags that trigger an investigation</h2>
Federal agencies like <a href="https://www.irs.gov/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" data-wpel-link="external">the IRS</a> and FBI don’t choose their targets at random. They rely on sophisticated monitoring systems and external tips to flag potential criminal behavior. Often, a simple discrepancy in a standard tax filing is enough to pull a professional into a much larger probe.

The following indicators often lead to a formal federal audit or investigation:
<ul>
 	<li>Unusual banking activity, such as frequent wire transfers to high-risk foreign jurisdictions</li>
 	<li>Significant discrepancies between a taxpayer’s reported income and their actual lifestyle</li>
 	<li>Whistleblower reports from disgruntled employees or former business partners</li>
 	<li>Referrals from financial institutions that notice suspicious patterns in corporate accounts</li>
</ul>
Once these red flags appear, federal agents begin building a case using forensic accounting. They can piece together years of transactions to show a pattern of willful evasion or laundering.
<h2>Defending against financial charges</h2>
Facing a federal financial investigation is a marathon, not a sprint. The government often spends months or even years gathering evidence before making an arrest. Because these cases rely heavily on paper trails, the defense should focus on the lack of criminal intent or errors in the government’s accounting.

Strategic legal defense usually involves these key components:
<ul>
 	<li>Working with forensic experts to challenge the prosecution’s financial theories</li>
 	<li>Demonstrating that financial errors were the result of negligence rather than a willful desire to break the law</li>
 	<li>Negotiating with federal agencies early to mitigate penalties or avoid a formal indictment</li>
</ul>
Working with <a href="/white-collar-crimes/" data-wpel-link="internal">experienced counsel</a> is the only way to navigate the dense web of federal statutes. An aggressive defense can often protect a professional's license and freedom during this high-stakes process.]]></content>
						        </entry>
	        <entry>
            <author>
									                    <name>by Law Office of Gregory S. Robey</name>
				            </author>
            <title type="html"><![CDATA[President Maduro and Wife Face New Indictment in Manhattan Federal Court]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.oh-criminal-lawyer.com/blog/2026/01/president-and-wife-face-new-indictment-in-manhattan-federal-court/" />
            <id>https://www.oh-criminal-lawyer.com/?p=47805</id>
            <updated>2026-01-05T22:46:22Z</updated>
            <published>2026-01-05T20:40:07Z</published>
					<taxo:topics><![CDATA[-]]></taxo:topics>
            <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Nicolas Maduro, President of Venezuela, faces a new indictment in federal court in the Southern District of New York. Mr. Maduro, is charged with narco-terrorism and conspiracy to import cocaine into the United States. His wife, Cilia Flores, the former Attorney General of Venezuela, is also charged with conspiracy to import cocaine. Mr. Maduro and his wife were captured in…]]></summary>
			                <content type="html" xml:base="https://www.oh-criminal-lawyer.com/blog/2026/01/president-and-wife-face-new-indictment-in-manhattan-federal-court/"><![CDATA[Nicolas Maduro, President of Venezuela, faces a new indictment in federal court in the Southern District of New York. Mr. Maduro, is charged with narco-terrorism and conspiracy to import cocaine into the United States. His wife, Cilia Flores, the former Attorney General of Venezuela, is also charged with conspiracy to import cocaine. Mr. Maduro and his wife were captured in a U.S. military raid on Caracas. Mr. Maduro had previously been indicted on similar charges in 2020, and had been declared a "fugitive of American Justice". The indictment charges Mr. Maduro, Ms. Flores, and other Defendants, including Mr. Maduro's son, Nicolasito Maduro, with partnering with narcotics traffickers and narco-terrorist groups that were sending cocaine from Venezuela to the United States, through countries like Honduras, Guatemala, and Mexico. If convicted, the defendants face decades in prison. Mr. Maduro and his wife have both pled not guilty to the charges.]]></content>
						        </entry>
	        <entry>
            <author>
									                    <name>by Law Office of Gregory S. Robey</name>
				            </author>
            <title type="html"><![CDATA[Alleged Killer in National Guard Shooting Faces Murder Charge]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.oh-criminal-lawyer.com/blog/2025/12/alleged-killer-in-national-guard-shooting-faces-murder-charge/" />
            <id>https://www.oh-criminal-lawyer.com/?p=47803</id>
            <updated>2025-12-01T21:14:25Z</updated>
            <published>2025-12-01T21:14:25Z</published>
					<taxo:topics><![CDATA[-]]></taxo:topics>
            <summary type="html"><![CDATA[An Afghan national, who police say gunned down two National Guard members near the White House, now faces a first degree murder charge. Rahmanullah Lakanwal, was originally charged with assault and weapons possession. However, Jeanine Pirro, the United States Attorney for the District of Columbia, has announced that the charges have been upgraded to first degree murder, upon receiving the…]]></summary>
			                <content type="html" xml:base="https://www.oh-criminal-lawyer.com/blog/2025/12/alleged-killer-in-national-guard-shooting-faces-murder-charge/"><![CDATA[An Afghan national, who police say gunned down two National Guard members near the White House, now faces a first degree murder charge. Rahmanullah Lakanwal, was originally charged with assault and weapons possession. However, Jeanine Pirro, the United States Attorney for the District of Columbia, has announced that the charges have been upgraded to first degree murder, upon receiving the news that U.S. Army Specialist, Sarah Beckstrom, had died from wounds suffered in the shooting. The alleged gunman had previously worked with the U.S. Military and CIA-backed forces in Afghanistan. Mr. Rahmanullah had been granted asylum this year, which allowed him to enter country. Ms. Pirro also announced that the case would be investigated for possible terrorism charges. The second soldier, U.S. Air Force Staff Sgt. Andrew Wolfe, remains hospitalized in critical condition.]]></content>
						        </entry>
	        <entry>
            <author>
									                    <name>by Law Office of Gregory S. Robey</name>
				            </author>
            <title type="html"><![CDATA[Supreme Court Will Rule on Trump&#8217;s Tariffs]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.oh-criminal-lawyer.com/blog/2025/11/supreme-court-will-rule-on-trumps-tariffs/" />
            <id>https://www.oh-criminal-lawyer.com/?p=47802</id>
            <updated>2025-11-04T17:15:43Z</updated>
            <published>2025-11-04T17:15:43Z</published>
					<taxo:topics><![CDATA[-]]></taxo:topics>
            <summary type="html"><![CDATA[The U.S. Supreme Court will hear arguments on whether President Donald Trump has overstepped federal law in imposing tariffs. Mr. Trump has used tariffs not only as part of his economic agenda, but also as the cornerstone of his foreign policy, in his second term. The U.S. Constitution gives Congress the power to impose taxes. However, Mr. Trump has relied…]]></summary>
			                <content type="html" xml:base="https://www.oh-criminal-lawyer.com/blog/2025/11/supreme-court-will-rule-on-trumps-tariffs/"><![CDATA[The U.S. Supreme Court will hear arguments on whether President Donald Trump has overstepped federal law in imposing tariffs. Mr. Trump has used tariffs not only as part of his economic agenda, but also as the cornerstone of his foreign policy, in his second term. The U.S. Constitution gives Congress the power to impose taxes. However, Mr. Trump has relied upon a 1977 law, where he contends that it gives him the presidential power to impose tariffs unilaterally during emergencies. Earlier this year, two lower courts found under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, that he did not have the power to set tariffs. The Supreme Court's six conservative justices have so far been receptive to Mr. Trump's claims of expanded presidential authority.]]></content>
						        </entry>
	        <entry>
            <author>
									                    <name>by Law Office of Gregory S. Robey</name>
				            </author>
            <title type="html"><![CDATA[Former FBI Director, James Comey, Pleads Not Guilty to Federal Charges]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.oh-criminal-lawyer.com/blog/2025/10/former-fbi-director-james-comey-pleads-not-guilty-to-federal-charges/" />
            <id>https://www.oh-criminal-lawyer.com/?p=47801</id>
            <updated>2025-10-08T22:24:03Z</updated>
            <published>2025-10-08T22:24:03Z</published>
					<taxo:topics><![CDATA[-]]></taxo:topics>
            <summary type="html"><![CDATA[James Comey, the former director of the FBI, has pled not guilty to charges that he lied to Congress. Mr. Comey and his lawyer appeared in federal court in Alexandria, Virginia, to answer an indictment filed last month that is based upon testimony that Mr. Comey gave before a Senate committee in September, 2020. The charge carries a maximum penalty…]]></summary>
			                <content type="html" xml:base="https://www.oh-criminal-lawyer.com/blog/2025/10/former-fbi-director-james-comey-pleads-not-guilty-to-federal-charges/"><![CDATA[James Comey, the former director of the FBI, has pled not guilty to charges that he lied to Congress. Mr. Comey and his lawyer appeared in federal court in Alexandria, Virginia, to answer an indictment filed last month that is based upon testimony that Mr. Comey gave before a Senate committee in September, 2020. The charge carries a maximum penalty of five years in federal prison. Mr. Comey's attorney indicated that the defense would be filing two separate motions to dismiss the charges based upon "vindictive" and "selective" prosecution, that they claim is politically motivated. The second motion to dismiss will challenge the recent appointment of the new U.S. Attorney for the Eastern Division of Virginia, Lindsey Halligan, and her authority to bring the charges.]]></content>
						        </entry>
	        <entry>
            <author>
									                    <name>by Law Office of Gregory S. Robey</name>
				            </author>
            <title type="html"><![CDATA[Sean Combs Faces Sentencing in Federal Case]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.oh-criminal-lawyer.com/blog/2025/10/sean-combs-faces-sentencing-in-federal-case/" />
            <id>https://www.oh-criminal-lawyer.com/?p=47800</id>
            <updated>2025-10-02T21:52:56Z</updated>
            <published>2025-10-02T21:52:56Z</published>
					<taxo:topics><![CDATA[-]]></taxo:topics>
            <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Sean Combs, the entertainer and music mogul, known as Diddy and Puff Daddy, is scheduled to be sentenced in a New York federal court on Friday, October 3, 2025. Mr. Combs was previously convicted of two felony counts of transportation to engage in prostitution, in violation of the federal Mann Act. Each count carries a possibility of up to 10…]]></summary>
			                <content type="html" xml:base="https://www.oh-criminal-lawyer.com/blog/2025/10/sean-combs-faces-sentencing-in-federal-case/"><![CDATA[Sean Combs, the entertainer and music mogul, known as Diddy and Puff Daddy, is scheduled to be sentenced in a New York federal court on Friday, October 3, 2025. Mr. Combs was previously convicted of two felony counts of transportation to engage in prostitution, in violation of the federal Mann Act. Each count carries a possibility of up to 10 years in federal prison. On Wednesday, October 1, 2025, the trial judge denied Mr. Combs' request to overturn his two convictions. At sentencing, federal prosecutors will be recommending a 135 month prison term, calling him "unrepentant" . The defense will be recommending a sentence of 14 months in prison, essentially time served to date. The judge will have the final say on the sentencing,, after considering the recommendations of the parties, the advisory federal sentencing guidelines, the nature and circumstances of the crimes, the history and characteristics of the defendant, and the need for just punishment, deterrence and rehabilitation. One of the biggest issues at sentencing is whether the judge should consider "acquitted conduct", in deciding the sentence. The defense team has argued that "acquitted conduct" should not be used in formulating a sentence, while federal prosecutors argue just the opposite - that the court should consider the "full evidence" presented at the trial, even bad acts that Mr. Combs was acquitted of. Most legal scholars expect the sentence to fall somewhere in between the sentencing recommendations given by the prosecution and the defense.]]></content>
						        </entry>
	</feed>